Iām reading in 1 Corinthians this week.
Actually, itās more than that. I am leading a group in a very brave Read The New Testament in 90 Days projectāand I am behind.
I. Am. The Leader.
Iām behind.
Anyway. I canāt help it; Iām already there. So letās move over to 1 Corinthians.
When this letter was written (somewhere around 56 BC) the city of Corinth was full of every sort of shameless, flagrant behavior. It was so horrid in fact that the phrase āto act the Corinthianā ā in Greek ā meant āto practice fornication.ā
Corinth was on a narrow isthmus between two seas; it served as a wealthy port center. Therefore, it had plenty of taverns. And a tiny, newly saved fledgling group of Christians had little say over what went on. Much like now.
So in the midst of all this, Paul visited Corinth and ended up staying 18 months. After that some mail was exchanged between him and the new church at Corinth, and he wrote the letter we call 1 Corinthians as a response to some of their questions.
Right up front, Paul addressed divisions within the church. Apparently the people were arguing. Perhaps some wanted to be led by a disciple who had actually been with Jesus. Perhaps some preferred Apollosā way of preaching. Perhaps a new Tea Party had formed within the ranks.
Paul wasted no ink before diving into the fray. āHas Christ been divided?ā He demanded (1 Cor. 1:13).
I love his in-your-face method. Nowadays in the church we see it, but donāt name it. We know it, but turn a blind eye. We live with it, like living with a favorite shoe that rubs the foot but is, nonetheless, a favorite so we put up with it.
Paul is not putting up with it.
Paul is having none of it. No division, no arguing, no classes, no Iām-better-because-I-was-baptized-by-(Cephas/Apollos/Paul/Christ).
āI thank God that I baptized none of youā¦that no man should say you were baptized in my name. For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel.ā
Paul knows his purpose. He has a clear, laser-sharp focus on what he was sent to do. Some might say baptism was a part of it; he says no. He knows his job is only to preach.
Today, the divisions are about carpet color, music style, who should be a deacon, etc. Yet a division is a division, and by focusing on those we are losing our laser focus. We forget what we were called for, to whom we were called, and give those up in favor of ⦠well, letās read on.
Then he went on to lecture them about the base, worldly things that they probablyā¦held dear. Whoops.
One of the things esteemed in Corinth was knowledge. The learned man, the one who was clever and smart; not that their group was full of this sort of man, but they would have admired them. This, Paul says, is the very antithesis of Godās wisdom:
āFor since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believeā¦
āBecause the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. God has chosen the foolish thing of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, and the base things of the world and the despised, God has chosen, the things that are not, that he might nullify the things that are, that no man should boast before God.ā * 1 Corinthians, parts of 1:17-31. Read in its entirety here.
Lest we get lost in that message, letās just say that God uses those who we would normally consider weak, unimportant or even foolish to deliver his message. Paul then summarizes it beautifully in 2:2 :
āFor I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.ā
As we think of all the things we do and are and want, I wonder if we could say the same? Could I say āI know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.ā
Could you…
What if weā¦
Hereās another version:
ā I deliberately kept it plain and simple: first Jesus and who he is; then Jesus and what he didāJesus crucified.ā *The Message
What if I took this as my mantra, and all I said or did to another ā especially someone with whom I am apt to disagree, or argueāwhat if all was based on that one statement.
Jesus.
Jesus crucified.
Jesus and who he is.
Not:
whoyouare / whoIam
Iām better
Iām smarter
Iām more important.
Not: doggone it let me talk! I have something to say.
Not even: look at me.
Just this:
Look at Jesus.
Look at him.
See his crucifixion?
See his love?
What was I going to argue about, again? I seem to have forgotten.